Leadership Styles and Organizational Commitment †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Leadership Styles and Organizational Commitment. Answer: Introduction Google LLC is can be characterized among one of the biggest multinational companies based in America. The organization mainly specializes in providing the internet related products and services that incorporates technologies of online advertising, search engine, software and various hardware and cloud computing platforms. The company was founded by Larry Page and Sergy Bin in the year 1998. The both of them own nearly 14% of the total share of the company and controls 56% of the stockholders power of voting through the stock of supervoting (Pearlson et al. 2016). This assignment will evaluate the mission and vision statement of Google LLC and at the same time will reflect on the understanding gained through the evaluation of these statements. On an added notion the leadership style adopted by the management of the organization in order to accomplish the vision will also be elaborated along with the suitable strategies that have been enacted to strengthen the leadership style. In the second part of the assignment the structural framework of the organization will be discussed along with the decision making processes that are being used by the company for maintaining its competitive edge. Evaluation of the Mission and Vision Statement The brief mission of the company is to organize the information around the world and make that easily accessible and useful to the users of the service. On the other hand, the vision or goal of the Google LLC is to develop the services of the company in such a way that it becomes able to improve the life of as much people as possible (Pisano, 2017). Google LLC is always regarded as an organization which is famously unstructured and possesses a unique operation style. However, the organization may be unusually structured but it maintains a systematic ordering from the bottom to the up. Its key focus always remain on what is new and exciting and how one can win with his or her own ideas (Rothaermel, 2015). In order to accomplish the mission of the company the board of directors followed a usual route in order to increase their managerial freedom. In order to maintain clarity and equal access to information the directors also informed the shareholders with an open letter that Google was not a conventional company and it did not intend to become one of them as well. This specific managerial structure can be regarded as the perfect and most suitable one for accomplishing the mission of accruing all the information around the world and incorporating those information within a single platform. It is mandatory to maintain a transparency between the management and the stakeholders which in turn motivates each and every one involved with the organization to work hard towards achieving the organizational mission and consider the mission of the organization as a shared goal. This has significantly contributed in accomplishing the goal of the organization as well (Uhl Gollenia, 2016). In the competitive environment people are striving for useful information and incorporating the useful information around the world into a single platform will substantially help Google to contribute towards the betterment of peoples life. In order to maintain the managerial structure and achieve the desired organizational outcome from the very beginning Google LLC has followed the transformational leadership style. The key attributes of which can be identified as achieving the goals and objectives in various unfamiliar ways. The organization believes in the mantra that if one cannot innovate anything in-house it is better to buy that which in contrast is opposite to Apple Inc which strictly believes in in-house innovation (Popli Rizvi, 2016). In other words the attributes of transformational leadership style can be stated as under this style the leader first identifies the areas where changes are needed to be implemented and works in coordination with the employees together at the same time through inspiring and motivating them the leader brings about those changes. In order to substantiate the leadership style Google has also enacted a few strategies which helps to strengthen the leadership and management structure of the organization. A few key strategies can be stated as follows, People who work with the organization are motivated in such a way that they strive to support the organization in retaining the position of King of search. Google considers a two way relationship between technology and strategy. Strategy is considered ass technology and vice versa (Yahaya and Ebrahim, 2016). The core strategy of Google is to acquire information, record the information, analyze it and applying the inner framework of the organization helps it to achieve the desired outcome. One of the most noteworthy strategy that supports the managerial framework is that the organization has never considered itself as a search engine it always believed that it is working on organizing available information throughout the world and making them useful and accessible to the people (Zareen et al. 2015). This in turn enabled its managers of workers to believe that that are working towards a noble purpose. Evaluation of the strategic management concepts used by Google LLC for maintaining its competitive edge The key for maintaining the strategic management structure of Google is that its bottom up structured here all the employees from all the levels play an important role in the process of strategy designing. Google LLC has designed its strategic framework in a way so that it works in association with the bottom-up process of developing strategies and approximates the logical incrementalism process. Presently the strategic planning has become more project oriented and complex in in nature (Al Sahi et al. 2016). Another feature of the strategic development of Google LLC is that it believes in developing a strategy through the process of experimentation and learning or which is called learning by doing. It first creates a number of small self-managed teams where knowledge is shared freely and the key norm is experimentation. Then it applies the principle of 70-20-10 which means 70% of the engineering resources would be devoted by Google in order to develop the core business while 20% will be used to develop that core area and 10% will be allocated to the fringe ideas (Notgrass 2014). The result of this the employees of Google becomes able to spend significant time working on the projects of their own choice. From this aspect it can be stated that Google LLC through the application of such a designed strategic framework became able to obtain a highly motivated workforce who are full of creativity, knowledge and the ability to invent. The organization faces steep competition in order to deal with which it follows a few strategies which are mentioned below, Hiring the best of the best employees because on the basis of their talent Google is flourishing and will continue to flourish in future. Protecting the intellectual property of the organization while increasing the rich portfolio of patents through the acquisition of new companies (Effelsberg et al. 2014). Continuously developing new knowledge and encouraging learning and incorporating those into new products and services. Conclusion On a concluding note it can be stated that the assignment has successfully investigated the strategic framework and the leadership structure followed by the organization. While conducting the study it has been observed that the structural framework of the company may seem to be unusual but it is highly organized and maintains a proper coordination between each of the department. For instance the leadership style adopted by the management is supported through set of strategies while the strategic framework is designed in a way that it encourages innovativeness and creativity which is also an integral part of the transformational leadership style. Reference List Al Sahi AL Zaabi, M. S., Ahmad, K. Z., Hossan, C. (2016). Authentic leadership, work engagement and organizational citizenship behaviors in petroleum company.International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,65(6), 811-830. Effelsberg, D., Solga, M., Gurt, J. (2014). Transformational leadership and followers unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation.Journal of Business Ethics,120(1), 81-93. Notgrass, D. (2014). The relationship between followers perceived quality of relationship and preferred leadership style.Leadership Organization Development Journal,35(7), 605-621. Pearlson, K. E., Saunders, C. S., Galletta, D. F. (2016).Managing and Using Information Systems, Binder Ready Version: A Strategic Approach. John Wiley Sons. Pisano, G. P. (2017). Toward a prescriptive theory of dynamic capabilities: connecting strategic choice, learning, and competition.Industrial and Corporate Change,26(5), 747-762. Popli, S., Rizvi, I. A. (2016). Drivers of employee engagement: The role of leadership style.Global Business Review,17(4), 965-979. Rothaermel, F. T. (2015).Strategic management. McGraw-Hill Education. Uhl, A., Gollenia, L. A. (2016).Digital enterprise transformation: A business-driven approach to leveraging innovative IT. Routledge. Yahaya, R. and Ebrahim, F., 2016. Leadership styles and organizational commitment: literature review.Journal of Management Development,35(2), pp.190-216. Zareen, M., Razzaq, K., Mujtaba, B. G. (2015). Impact of transactional, transformational and laissez-faire leadership styles on motivation: A quantitative study of banking employees in Pakistan.Public Organization Review,15(4), 531-549.